Identify the disagreement exactly
The Brothers Disney Strawberry page describes 0.26oz individual bags in a 12pack. Its individual front and nutrition panel use 7.5g per bag. A separate box image states 12×0.35oz and 120g. Twelve 7.5g bags would total 90g arithmetically, so the displayed materials do not establish one coherent current total net mass.
Do not decide by convenient arithmetic
The product is not marked 90g here merely because that multiplication is straightforward. Nor is it marked 120g simply because a large box photo prints that figure. The site has not received the package and cannot identify the version the warehouse will send. A packaging-transition notice is relevant context but does not resolve the numeric contradiction.
Retain what is independently consistent
The exact product name, SKU DIS1X12STRW, displayed price and 12inner-bag count can remain in the reference. That supports a price per shown complete offer or per counted inner bag. It does not support price per ounce, total calories in a shipped box, fresh-fruit equivalence or a food-mass inventory target. The tools reject the affected bases while preserving useful fields.
Ask for a current written specification
Request the current inner net mass, number of inner bags, total net mass and a photo of the corresponding complete label for that SKU. Also ask about availability, because the page currently reports Out of Stock. Keep the maker’s reply with a date and the version it addresses. A generic response saying the fruit is unchanged may not answer the packaging quantity question.
Keep earlier evidence rather than overwrite it
Once clarified, save the corrected record alongside the earlier images and the reason for the change. That avoids pretending a contradiction was never present. A buyer who needs a guaranteed mass before ordering should keep the purchase pending until the specification is resolved, even if the displayed per-bag price seems attractive.
Two plausible totals are still an unresolved offer
A spreadsheet could calculate90gfrom twelve7.5gbags and separately read120gfrom the box. Averaging those totals would not identify an actual package; choosing the larger one would simply make a lower cost-per-gram figure. Preserve both source statements and refuse the affected comparison. The confirmed12inner bags can still support a package-count ledger. This is a field-specific limitation, not a reason to delete every useful observation or to claim the whole product has been physically inspected.
Sources & scope
Checked November 4, 2026. Manufacturer and retailer references support the specific statements. Dated displayed prices are not final checkout quotes, performance rankings or performance testing. This shopping reference does not replace the exact product label or qualified individual advice. Current received labels and independent food-nutrition/content/commerce review remain pending.
Keep reading
Does pitted or ready-to-eat wording eliminate fragment warnings? ↗
Can a displayed price be used when the product is out of stock? ↗